constitution allows for war and we could have easily gotten a record or a warrant to look at that Boston

to generalized warrant scooping up everyone's record we wanted suspicion to be individualized no

you have a single warrant that has the name Verizon on it you collect hundreds of millions of records from one war and

there ever was a general warrant if there ever was a generalized collection of

if you have a warrant right now and it's as Verizon on that to me sounds like a general warrant that sounds not very specific it

ensure that we continue to have humane treatment and event we have visibility of detainees opposed to th opposed

is merely a constitutional amendment that says this that it's weird that we need a constitutional amendment to

in this case and in the boston bombing case i don't think we're actually using the constitution to constitutional tools that we have interpretation

founding fathers fought the revolution over is that the government shouldn't be allowed to have a blanket warrants or a generalized war I

Verizon and that we should collect all of the customers of arise and that's a general warrant and

name ask me on the warrant you can't put Verizon on a warrant and look at all Verizon customer you

sounds like you're collecting the records of everybody Verizon that's what was revealed by Snowden so you now have a warrant that collects the information on millions

should be able to collect my phone records if I'm not suspicious if I if you don't have a problem because of a judge as on a warrant why would you go to look at my phone record tell

the constitution using probable cause one gentleman that it already been implicated in this same as the sonora boy

that if you write the name Verizon and you collect all the records from the company Verizon that's a that's

to secretly collecting keep a record a telephone call intelligence agencies say that is vital to