had used chemical weapons hurt the president's credibility should the president have stuck to his red line what

who gets the chemical weapons there's enough chemical weapons there to kill thousands if not millions of people so

question is there ability to use the weapons there %HESITATION proclivity to use the weapon and

their intelligence sources the use of chemical weapons are European allies have %HESITATION confirmed from their intelligence sources the use of chemical weapons our

you tell aside don't cross this red line please don't use chemical weapons against your own people he

going to be some nuclear technology or chemical weapon a weapon of mass destruction that's

had the authority to use lethal force to stop the tears from using that plane as a fourth weapon against

year later with overwhelming evidence that assad had in fact used chemical weapons in cross that red line president

had rather have a nuclear capability then use military force and he said so to his credit not

they will allow an international force to secure the seventeen chemical weapon sites enough weapons to kill millions of people and

develop a nuclear weapon if you left the centrifuges intact another file them to produce a weapon down

I continue to believe that you respect chemical weapons are beyond the chemical weapons it is still a vital national security interests of the United States the

evidence that Assad had in fact used chemical weapons in cross that red line president Obama declined to use military force against the Assad regime as

that would change my calculus the use of chemical weapons is and would be totally unacceptable and

to use those nuclear weapons the Ayatollah Khamenei routinely leaves chants of death to

commit to destroying those weapons that in the new Syria they were rejected owning chemical weapons if they would do those two things I told them I