%HESITATION authorized authorization to use military force against al queda and affiliated groups so

evidence that Assad had in fact used chemical weapons in cross that red line president Obama declined to use military force against the Assad regime as

obama declined to use military force against the assad regime as president would you have used military force that well

remain unconvinced that the use of force proposed here will work the only thing that will prevent Assad from using chemical weapons in the future as for the Syrian people to remove him from power strike

members into Yemen to strike against one of these organizations does present have that authority to to

have all the authorization and legal authorities necessary to conduct a drone strike against a terrorist organizations in Yemen without changing the AMF yes

would with made the war against radical Islam or tear whatever description like to a

the Congress has given every president since nine eleven the authority to use military force against allocate

question is there ability to use the weapons there %HESITATION proclivity to use the weapon and

not only lawful under the authorization to use military force is within their hair authority

only thing that will prevent Assad from using chemical weapons in the future as for the Syrian people to remove him from power strike

as president to report all custodial deaths all incidents involving the use of lethal force and

or founders never intended for the tax code to be used as a weapon against US citizens burdensome

if he did have weapons he had used weapons on his neighbor's previously had used chemical weapons on his neighbors so

an authorization to use force but a statement that if that day comes and Israel has to justifiably

who to target who the enemy was and whether not to use lethal force from the executive branch I'm