of those tools is the ability to question people about future attacks to gather intelligence for national security purposes without

we should be allowed to question him for intelligence gathering purposes to find out about future attacks and terrorist organizations that may exist that

this suspect without a lawyer present to gather intelligence about a future attack is

was right as Miranda rights never designated enemy combatant we never interrogated him for intelligence gathering purposes Asama

the law of armed conflict when you're trying to gather intelligence about future attacks against your nation there

makes us stronger not weaker we have the ability under the law for to gather intelligence and

to limit our ability to gather intelligence to the criminal justice system because in essence you've turned over the intelligence gathering process to

gather intelligence if we have to clear the questions are that we're going to ask to gather intelligence through

here's what I'm worried about I want to interrogate him for intelligence gathering purposes I want the FBI and the CIA spend

intelligence about future attacks it may come our way and none of the information can be used against him in

a way to make sure that our country is safe from future attacks the ability to talk to individuals who may know about terrorist organization plotting

Guantanamo bay for intelligence gathering purposes as long as it took to get good intelligence he

wrote that law what I want to do is find out what he may know about forced terrorist connections about future plots ok

future attacks against our nation DDT qualify for enemy you don't know where this

more than anything else you're strolling the ability to hold them under the law of war for intelligence gathering purposes so

to prove his guilt or innocence there's ample evidence of that but to gather intelligence asked what he may know about