future attacks against our nation DDT qualify for enemy you don't know where this

were also trying to prevent a future attack when you're gathering intelligence you don't use the evidence against the defendant used

I'm talking about this is an intelligence gathering national security exercise to protect us against future attacks driven by

I'm talking about this is an intelligence gathering national security exercise to protect us against future attacks driven by

the law of war were trying to protect the nation intelligence gathering as a national security endeavor prosecuting

of those tools is the ability to question people about future attacks to gather intelligence for national security purposes without

intelligence about future attacks it may come our way and none of the information can be used against him in

this suspect without a lawyer present to gather intelligence about a future attack is

ability to interrogate the suspect for intelligence gathering purposes about future attacks that we may face nine

that rainy has Miranda rights because we're trying to gather intelligence to make sure we can prevent future attacks and

wrote that law what I want to do is find out what he may know about forced terrorist connections about future plots ok

of course has come up the Boston terror attack against Emirates questions about what it means about who were leading in the country but

want to collect information about future terrorist activity we have every right to question him of

we should be allowed to question him for intelligence gathering purposes to find out about future attacks and terrorist organizations that may exist that

enforce the laws and get the job done let me ask about religious liberty you're hosting of %HESITATION gathering

a lawyer together intelligence to prevent a future attack rather than having to do yeah shake through