overwhelming air power not this photo op foreign policy in a bomb here in a missile there but overwhelming

than using concerted overwhelming air power to take out isis secondly you're right the Kirch can't solve everything but

it that can contain or defeat ISIS without it a minimum Merrick and air power he said so

if the clearly outlined what we're going to do about and I hope that that will include a sustained air campaign and bombing every element of our air power targeting

doing the least amount possible and its leading this terrible outcome do you believe we should put US troops on the ground there and it

overwhelming air power to target and destroy isis but number two we are I mean the hurts the current here on the ground there fighting the peshmerga the

air attacks support and other support arming those people need to be armed but you guys are gonna have to get into this is so

don't see them launching air strikes against isis what they they're very happy to have us do they work so

to use serious overwhelming air power problem is right now the obama clinton carry foreign policy has

air strikes in would you support right arming it sounds like you would army the peshmerga that the act Kurdish forces I

ought to use the Kurds as boots on the ground along with overwhelming air power now that that

to use serious overwhelming air power the problem is right now the Obama Clinton carry foreign policy has

would I join the losing side I'm it's better for me to flee into Turkey or Jordan or Lebanon or anywhere for that matter it

air power going after isis and number two arming the courage on the ground who are fighting I just

defeat and you're seeing the results of it you cannot defeat an army on the ground simply from the air and to put all your eggs in the basket of hoping that local ground forces will be able to do the job with

there were Iraqis their theory rebelled and the cards alone will not be able to do it are federally I thank you very much I