going to be some nuclear technology or chemical weapon a weapon of mass destruction that's

what I see what I just tried to lay out the last segment is very simply the they made the case for Saddam Hussein had a weapons of mass destruction everybody

don't either of course not I mean the entire predicate of the war against Iraq was the intelligence that show they had weapons of mass destruction and that there was a real risk they might use

mass weapons well I'm not a crook not even a smidgen of corruption

nothing about it Iran is marching toward a nuclear weapon the challenge of our time is to keep weapons of mass destruction out of the hands of radical Islamist and

problem is we've already sent the wrong that the last time a leader gave up his desire of for weapons of mass destruction and we

now this president has given those radicals the pathway to a nuclear weapon the most destructive weapon the world has ever invent these

an issue that has long standing consequences of Iran becomes a a nuclear weapons powers I anticipate they will over

after Feinstein you have been consistent year is sincere is the day is long and I

have had unleashed on us weapons of mass distraction nndb because this is a week in which people

this is ultimately why Iraq has devolved into a failed state because what we've got is

the supply route that they now have in place again this is not about saving Malachy this is about preventing these guys from setting up a caliphate that

has absolutely has not exercises decided that when a client has concluded absolutely

it's apparent that their mission is making money and the services are the destruction or is the destruction of

here's the problem first of all this is not about nation building in Iraq I hear people say that today or or you

nndb argues that I mean you sure these weapons and Israel