person is that and one of the arguments is well we don't have enough evidence to convict him in civilian court but we could hold him under military

person is that and one of the arguments is well we don't have enough evidence to convict him in civilian court but we could hold him under military

turn him over to our civilian court system annnnd nd

case forward %HESITATION when my jag is said Sir we don't have enough compelling evidence that he said she said which

we're gonna see in this case they have video evidence they have more than enough evidence to convict him without without a confession what

question is who is we how long have we had him we did we have been thank you

he's not an American citizen %HESITATION that Americans have in civilian courts in this country we

point is that court martial panels or not jury of one's peers their juries made up of people who have expertise

budget in a surplus we could have made social security solvent for as far as the eye could see we

we've accomplished we have turned around the economy we control over our think of what we could have done with that balanced

tired of it but they in everyone of these arguments senator the the leadership will argue no we have we have the same goals we just have different tactics well

so they that was the longest they could interrogate him and then they put him in the civilian court system so we're seeing a pattern here and

any of us thought well we would like not to have a military conflict with Iran but

able to act in do you have the ability to act in you aware of the threats yes Sir we do have the ability to

the enemy decides where the battlefield is and it could be any place on the planet we have to be aware and that

we on and we understand because I don't want everybody in the country to think that every allegation is %HESITATION