federal government background check before engaging in a purely private transaction with another private citizen to law abiding citizen now

no evidence whatsoever whatsoever to suggest that a private transaction between two law abiding citizen poses

go through federal government approval before engaging in that private transaction that's the current state of the law and

on the wrong prob the problem is not to law abiding citizens engaging in a private transaction between firearms the problem in violent

firearms the federal government keeping a list of every firearm that is lawfully owned by every law abiding citizen would

we've seen without burdening law abiding citizens we ensure the second amendment is protected while

the federal he sang it will send the federal government and and he won't force the federal law that's

a federal government that protects the right to keep and bear arms of all law abiding Americans instead

the federal government out of the lives of law abiding and we need to defend the tenth amendment and that means keeping the federal government out of areas that properly belong to

the federal government is now trying to coerce private citizen violate their religious it's wrong and

the consequence of doing that nnj is on multiple levels number one it increases the burden on law abiding citizens to

cost the power of a federal government that frankly advantages the big powerful

part that does not infringe or place additional burdens on law abiding citizens and in fact is effective at keeping

the federal government to do its job and the job of the federal government is to enforce the immigration laws that we have make

power of the federal government passed a new budget that caps the federal budget that that that costs the federal budget that cap spending going forward and

the most sensible in terms of balancing of the rights of law abiding citizens and