it might but that's fundamentally wrong the consequence of that statement that standard that standard is

possible under the law to go even further

now I'm not talking about that I'm talking about is if the legal authority under a law to do that under under domestic authority he would have that

put her name to it to being part of it I would point out that under Kentucky law well that might make it that's not right under Kentucky law number one her name would be on it regardless and saying

that even the patriot act which says you can gather information if it's relevant to the investigation say I'm

that would make sure that Congress would would be fully under all the contours of obamacare you think would give them the

we need standards but education standards of bozeman said it state level i have confidence in the states and they say well

under the principle that there should be that every single american should have it will protection under the law and

a double standard if it was a guy up there saying that he would give and degree machine and that some people might say that's all

there on the stump you pronounce even answering these questions for awhile even Hey I'm answering these even answering these questions for awhile even

that it doesn't change the underlying equation the underlying equation is that you are insisting on not just good

we would grant liability protection to those who met those standards would be voluntary does that sound like a respond

of the investigations that happened under President Bush or whether under president Reagan assertion of executive privilege on

I'm not even saying that in a bragger

for one hundred years there but these jobs than out of me before that could workers needed to learn marketable that could be standardized across

lead drone strike is because the president lowered the standards on drone strikes in Pakistan hid away now that