and the Supreme Court

states maybe New York and California would go one way and maybe Texas and Florida would go the other that's the

down there and click on any of the videos over here to watch the latest interviews show highlights and

US justice system I argued marrying before the Supreme Court twice on the other side was the world court the

you're absolutely right and the supreme court's decision on marriage was naked judicial activism it

against bigotry and and racial oppression on the side of the Cuban immigrant bigotry fundamentally wrong and

there's no religious backing for that and and one of the things that you know that in that loving Virginia commercials Virginia case which is that struck down the fans on on

has equal rights regardless of race and and that was honoring the promise of the constitution was the right thing to do you

and over again we fought and defended religious liberty and one we defended the ten commandments and one we defend the pledge of allegiance and one you

justice away from the Supreme Court saying yes the federal court can come and order a

detention of the court justices of the Supreme Court and other areas on the should not be worried about and making

the original sin of our country that was slavery slavery was grotesque and immoral and some six hundred thousand Americans lost their lives spill their blood on American soil to

both Republicans and Democrats Pratt to join together and in what I call the Washington cartel you talk about corruption money in politics and yet you're suggesting this constitutional amendment that would subject Supreme Court justices to

the U. S. Supreme Court and won you nana but of all the battles the biggest was a case called marrying versus Texas many

we are going to overturn this disastrous Supreme Court decision on citizens United because that decision is

guilty and marrying raised the exact same arguments and what the US Supreme Court concluded was two things number