that would be the proper way to do that as to an enemy combatant termination every person designated as an enemy combatant under our system has

his lawyer so that's what I would do hostage department of there's enough he may well right or we're at war with left

do you what do you ask in the just part of the pre I'll just tell you what I would do if our I would say there's enough at I

had for decades if from her that they were involved with potentially involve other enemy so would

that an enemy combatant traditionally is been held and tried by the military and

I would allow the FBI there and here if the government says you're an military you to a federal court and

had a small munitions factory they were making IEDs they were going grenades and pipe bombs out of the car the

had a small munitions factory they were making IEDs they were going grenades and pipe bombs out of the car the

had a small munitions factory they were making IEDs they were going grenades and pipe bombs out of the car the

of our nation they can be held captured in treated as an enemy combatant they have committed a %HESITATION

doubt but there is that the the fact that these are enemy combatants and no matter where they are they

the absence of such evidence I know of no legal basis for his detention as an enemy combatant the hold the suspect as an enemy combatant under these circumstances would be contrary to our laws and

would hold him under that theory when the public safety accepting expires that's very limited that was a rape case where a guy had an empty holster there

if our president United States I would say there's ample evidence to suggest that the survivor it's a radical jihadists to that's overseas connections and

find out what they know about feature attacks with a lawyer that is not the law in if it were it would be crazy well

did they do what they did in Boston they think we're a Christian nation that were a colonial power that we're infidels they hate us because of who we are that's