legal assaults on marriage the constitution explicitly gives Congress the power to strip jurisdiction

attacks on marriage the constitution gives that the Congress is a check and balance but number three actually on you on your radio show you

a tax on marriage the constitution gives authority over jurisdiction the Congress as a way of checking and

the story of jurisdiction over challenges to marry that's an explicit check the constitution gives Congress to raid in an over reaching judiciary and

defend the constitution of the United States not one that undermines attacks and ignores the constitution of the United States Hardenbergh

wrote the constitution ignored the constitution and purported to tear down the marriage laws adopted

just cause and without constitutional approval of Congress nndb

would be a constitution with a branch Congress that would be quote dependent on

constitutional scholars differ in terms of the way that it can be effectively done some constitutional scholars argue Congress

the left views constitutionality that in their mind appropriate and constitutional are one in the same and

congress appropriated us and n. inappropriately balance that across our portfolio

I think Congress should do is we should use the constitutional authority that we are given is checks and balances to rein in a

decades fighting to defend the constitution and under the constitution marriage has always been a question for

substance on marriage I've introduced a constitutional amendment that would protect the authority of state legislatures to define marriage as the union of one man and one woman we

is likely to vote on on this catastrophic Iranian nuclear deal sadly Congress is given

the present mn as president I will restore the constitutional balance our founders and