think expanding the background check system is not the problem making the background system catch

thousand more felons on the run from the law and not one of them got prosecuted for you expand the background check system to

think that's the first thing we should address expanding a broken system where more people fail a background check but don't get prosecuted that's not much of a deterrent and

the background system before you would expand it so I support Grassley cruise grand I think it's got a comprehensive approach it

health records the background checks if you don't have state submitting their records the background check system we have in place today cannot operate

are seventy six thousand people last year failed a background check in less than one percent gap prosecuted there

individuals transferring their weapons and having to go to get the background check makes no sense before you to expand the background check there

think that anything that requires that they expanded the background check %HESITATION to everyone who sells a

sense that by partisan legislation to require universal background checks would

and background system should be changed what's the difference and I think the difference is it my democratic colleagues want to expand the background check law to

a broken system how can it be that the background check would allow her to buy a gun how

if you fail the background check you're providing gastro man purchases that here's what I would suggest I

would be safer my argument is if you have more background checks that include more people and

nine thousand people in two thousand ten failed a background check who are felons on the run and none of them were prosecuted so for before you expend background checks include

one want to fill in on the run who fails a background check to be prosecuting put back in jail surely

what I want American arrow if you fail a background check in this country would amnesty absolutely nothing one