we seem to have a recurring question in the Middle East whether or not it's a good idea to topple secular strong manner secular dictator and

think when we've toppled secular strongman secular dictators we've gotten chaos in the rise of radical Islam so

what happens after that you know Hillary Clinton's war in Libya was the same kind of scenario toppled Qaddafi is secular dictator we

sometimes intervention makes us less safe this is the real debate we have to have in the middle east every time we've toppled a secular dictator

I'm perfectly willing to have these debates because I think histories on my side that every time we've toppled a secular dictator have

that's a hypothetical question I think it's a recurring question in the nightly is it a good idea to

top all secular dictators and what happens when we do I think when Hussein was toppled we got chaos we still have chaos in Iraq in

we have a better sense of what the heck happens after a dictator topples and can take action to

special forces were poised and ready and had repeatedly asked for permission to go in and try to intervene and

gotta go where people go right and %HESITATION I actually had a quite a good time and halfway

common core i think it's a bad idea the idea of having a national dictate

a job just isn't poor and in order to do that job we have to have access from a the ability to ask relevant questions and

kids can go to a christian school and they asked me a question in spanish ominous show respect and answer that question

have to go out the same day and commit crimes in a black neighborhood

those relating to stopping someone understands Washington and and and reminding secular burns on a number of questions I know that secretary Clinton visited Libya in October of two thousand and eleven did the security actuation

be a multi faceted plan to help the Syrian people get rid of aside and replace them with a secular and moderate government they deserve and