the criminal justice system where his lawyer controls the conversation absolutely do you really want to turn over intelligence gathering to the terrorist and his lawyer and

%HESITATION national security matters is to go through his lawyer turns over to the terrorists and their lawyer controlling

to limit our ability to gather intelligence to the criminal justice system because in essence you've turned over the intelligence gathering process to

have the right to gather intelligence under the criminal system you should not question someone without their lawyer present under

last thing in the world I want to do is turn intelligence gathering over to the terror suspect in their lawyer I

if we limit ourselves to gathering intelligence to the criminal justice system and not use the national security system I'm talking about guess

it be a shame to shut the system down and turn it over to a criminal defense lawyer Antoinette be just really

to use the criminal justice system to gather intelligence would be a mistake because if that's the only way we can gather into you're

establish a reporter in together intelligence without his lawyer being present one so I

part from the criminal justice system to protect the rest of us we've been doing that for a decade so in other words you want to hold them for thirty days debrief him anything he says during the debriefing anyone have a lawyer present as

this is why we need a national security legal system focus on gathering intelligence we have turned over the intelligence gathering system the

give him a fair trial he deserves a lawyer in the criminal justice system the lawyer who defends him will be doing America great service he

we interrogated over a long period of time what I want is pretty simple I want to be of the talk to him without a lawyer present together

the a national security legal system not the criminal justice legal system the New York times editorial board in part says Mister Graham's reckless statement makes

criminal defense lawyers in the accused we have been using enemy combatant information to fight the war on terror for a decade we

now we're down to this if you don't hold him as an enemy combatant where you can question him without a lawyer our