about trade because I'm totally against the trade bill

trade because I'm totally against a trade bill for a number of reasons number one the people negotiating I don't have a clue our

blue American if I oppose this bill and my reasonable American %HESITATION believing that the constitution says guns

were separated for a reason when the constitution says that Congress declares war not the president it was separated for a reason so

into existence there is a reason why in the constitution and the bill of rights the very first protection in

is merely a constitutional amendment that says this that it's weird that we need a constitutional amendment to

why I have a constitutional amendment that says Congress shall pass no law that exempts themselves and

is a reason why in the constitution and the bill of rights the very first protection in the very first amendment in the bill of rights is

you look historically historically federal tax revenues been about eighteen percent of GDP federal government expenditures have been roughly twenty percent of GDP in

have been raising questions about the nine bills that he introduced over twenty years %HESITATION

trade agreements have been pushed by corporate America all for one very simple reason and

best as we can of the constitution and there's a difference sometimes between what the constitution says and what a court says the constitution says absolute

that the constitution's origination clause applies to trade bills which means the house of representatives has to be involved there's

says this is not a trade pact this is not your simple trade deal were not talking nafta were

constitutional authority I'm not saying it's a bunch of governors a more powerful position but the constitutional authority is

with Iran that should have been a treaty should never have been an executive agree but this horrible dream crafted