say let's go after violent criminals instead then just like now he went directly after the constitutional rights of law abiding citizens rather than solving the problem well

constitutional rights of law abiding citizen they weren't interested in doing anything to go after real

after the violent criminals come down on them like a ton of bricks but protect the constitutional rights of law abiding American nnj

%HESITATION those constitutional rights for law abiding as citizens that possess a firearms but also going after those

than going after the constitutional rights of law abiding Americans the president should be focused on

the constitution honor the rule of law and protect the bill of rights now

Obama administration doesn't do that instead they try to use these trad as an excuse to come after the constitutional rights of law abiding citizens it's unconstitutional it's

president Obama came out he didn't come out and say let's go after violent criminals which you should have done instead

instead he used as an excuse to try to come after the second amendment rights of law abiding citizens not

say let's go after violent felons let's go after criminals let's protect our kids and stop the bad guys but

he tried to use it as an excuse to go after the second amendment rights of law abiding citizens and everyone in Washington said it

the most sensible in terms of balancing of the rights of law abiding citizens and

violent criminals and and the dangerously mentally ill but he's not interested in doing that he's interested in going after your and my constitutional rights and

at the end of the day these proposals are not going to carry the day in the Senate we should be going after the criminal not the law abiding citizen and

into federal court giving them the same constitutional rights as an American citizen but

is the time to go after a do everything humanly possible to repeal obamacare now