power to determine who the enemy is in a time of war and what kind of forced to use and give it to a bunch of judges that

what they're trying to do is find out what terrorist groups we know about it individuals and who the hell are called enough

know exactly what you're trying to say there is no lawful authority in the law of war or any others the

point is that court martial panels or not jury of one's peers their juries made up of people who have expertise

the American MP people appreciate the way you protect the homeland is you try to find out what the enemies that I'm

help of this community saying lost what is that man did they quit not I don't mean to interrupt you Sir could

had violated the Iowa constitution by mandating gay marriage you were once the Attorney General of Texas the current Attorney General says clerks can refuse same

would agree with the purpose of the patriot act is not to allow the executive branch together political intelligence on the judicial

you be clear which movies where people who have left the department of justice %HESITATION and quit not been replaced so

by a handful of incredibly wealthy people who are saying you know what eighty billion is

need it from my point of now under the law of war there are three branches a guard what branch of government is in charge of

for the federal government to do its job yet what what what did you mean when you said it could unreasonably single out people who are here legally

you have a president who appoints an Attorney General who is a man or woman of integrity as a

Attorney General everyone of those is identical do what Harry Reid the Democrats would have done it and people

are you comfortable with the idea that the president has asked the Attorney General to review as the Attorney General to review the

of of the road you agree with me that one of the treasure troves of intelligence regarding the war into