judicial overreach the framers wrote about judicial overreach quite a bit they believe the check would be impeachment now

is exactly that today we've seen judicial lawless crossover into judicial tyranny for

Supreme Court justice are either so I've called for several the framers thought that would be the check impeachment

to have a meaningful check for we the people to rein in judicial tyranny tell

have what Jefferson said was judicial tyranny the reason that this is a real issue that we need to think about thank

also as you know %HESITATION the was impeached the president was impeached and %HESITATION was %HESITATION lying and the

have what jefferson said was judicial tyranny the reason that this is a real issue that we need to think about thank

so the federalist papers they talk about the response to you to show tyranny is impeachment unfortunately

I think maybe we need to come together and stand against this judicial tyranny that is fundamentally wrong

under the principle that there should be that every single american should have it will protection under the law and

that is a big and it's a dramatic step it's never been done before in Congress but the framers put in place checks

in the quarters of power all I ask if you consider the record I'm putting before and give me the opportunity to earn your cost

a danger of bias entering into separate the police power from the judicial power up the judge that will be judge and to depart on a is

a danger of bias entering into it if you don't separate the police power from the judicial power the judge that will be judge and apartado is

dominance of an aristocratic Lee but under the principle that there should be no permanent or stock that

especially those who otherwise would have no voice recorders of power all i ask is that you consider the record i'm putting before you and