that was the third thing you mention about retention elections you mentioned twenty states have retention elections these

finally not call for a constitutional amendment subject Supreme Court justices your periodic retention elections twenty

a cream court justices subject to periodic judicial retention elections twenty states across the union do that and if the Supreme Court justices are

I can tell you that twenty states have put in place judicial retention elections and they have worked out of the people have use them sparingly but

a last week I called for a constitutional amendment putting in place periodic judicial retention elections such

adopted retention elections for judges when they face state charges that we're doing with the Supreme Court is doing disobeying

judicial retention elections I have to ask you that wouldn't that make the Supreme Court justices more

sex marriage and and and I I think we need to look to fundamental structural changes such as periodic retention election and

know we look at the practices about hal retention elections that operated across the country in the Indian twenty state where that happened the

what's interesting you know I I wrote a long op ed in National Review laying out the twenty states have adopted retention elections now they're rarely used but

we're going to elect the first woman president of the United States and we're going to elect Hillary Clinton who

November's general election

working to elect this man president of the United States.

was an astonishing election in November but it's important to understand what the election signify the election was not and

there are many fair minded well intentioned election officials and state legislators all

happy to start with twenty sixty I'm sure she'll have her own hypothetical but I appreciate that one let me ask you in terms of this retention election idea would