unanimously before the Supreme Court and in private practice representing pro bono for free over

to get on all these panels up now for the audience he's one of the big leftists on the a circuit court in DC %HESITATION

words one nation under god winning unanimous court or defending them ha a lone white Latin cross well represented three million veterans defending

I was very pleased to author a U. S. Supreme Court brief on behalf of several senators in

went to the Supreme Court and we won unanimously and then in private practice I was proud to join with my good friend Kelly Shackelford in

point is that court martial panels or not jury of one's peers their juries made up of people who have expertise

not about federal court not being available in the war on terror article three courts have done a good job in many cases of prosecuting terrace the

so ever which means if their view prevailed in the next president's going to get one two three maybe four Supreme Court justices court

an effect so for example in California nineteen eighty six the people of California recall several Supreme Court justices that

we've seen two Supreme Court decisions in two days to support all judges disappoint David Souter disappointed the most how

all those people and think nothing of it may thirty first a federal District Court judge in South Carolina orders

and judges were never designed to create they were never designed to create public pop the role of a judge to interpret the law to basically decide whether the trial court under

does that tell the present I think it tells the president that there is a strong almost unanimous bipartisan consensus in the Senate that the Senate have to play a role in

lies of the Washington cartel that suggests those are somehow in conflict out tell you come down the

I think there's also a significant chance a majority of the court will conclude that that is severable and what that means is you

anyone three a back there I so Catherine at home is three I'll tell you back in twenty twelve when