and they have not yet green lighted to go and see some of the military action of any sort I mean or any action and I

have never supported the use of military force of U. S. military force in this conflict and I still don't I

a provider facilitated the sale or transfer of weapons petroleum and or petroleum products to Assad third

have always been and should still be a multi faceted plan to help the Syrian people get rid of aside and replace them with a secular and moderate government they deserve and

things up and and sort of a shifted some of the direction of the party and yet and

be a multi faceted plan to help the Syrian people get rid of aside and replace them with a secular and moderate government they deserve and

mean there were you see the Russians and agents and elements stir of the sort of pretexts for any sort of intervention there's

the administration wants us to approve I do not believe furthers that goal and in fact I believe that US military action of

mean they'll ignore us instead they become bigger and harder to solve and sadly Syria's just the latest example that fundamental true had

the hopes of helping the Syrian people replace Assad with a stable secular and moderate government however while I have long argued forcefully for engagement and empowering the Syrian people I

I believe this committee by a vote of fifteen to three has already instead our response should have should have always been and should still

use Syria arm Hezbollah and then two attackers Israel the use of the traffic weapons and terrorists to destabilize Iraq second

and I love the military and i wanna have the strongest military

to turn grief confusion and person bus and action but that's what we have

being put in Hillary's of you know coffers and Jeb bush and Marco and all of them I mean they're

Heidi and I just listened quietly and if any of y'all have ever done that just sort of quietly listen to your kids and