current state of the law is those background checks are in place when a licensed firearm dealer sells %HESITATION

licensed firearm dealer who sells at a gun show has to have a background check it it's a requirement that applies to

a broken system how can it be that the background check would allow her to buy a gun how

fee is not determined I would point out the district of Columbia right now charges a hundred and fifty dollars for a background check so

sense that by partisan legislation to require universal background checks would

is not hidden the text of fast track anyone can read the bill it was a bill that's pending that's not hidden that's simply the process for

go and go through the firearm that go through the background check number two increases the cost because the way that the

the department of justice has been explicit that when you require background checks for private firearms transact the

the current law is not much of a deterrent and if you expanded the current law and you had more people that fell a background check and

while the bill as far as I can see apparatus that I think the bill that is pending on the floor of the Senate is is the wrong approach to

would be safer my argument is if you have more background checks that include more people and

firearms the federal government keeping a list of every firearm that is lawfully owned by every law abiding citizen would

the Democrat bill that is on the floor of the Senate and I would note that that bill instead what it would do is expand the

to this they do a background check in three days yeah I understand that this is a different kind of background check is not this

think that anything that requires that they expanded the background check %HESITATION to everyone who sells a

back who fell a background check if I could and a part of the senator who reads bill is we understand it will be expanding background checks to people who purchase guns at