Sen. Rand Paul Joins Hannity- April 20, 2015

is a senator who's been a very big critic of Hillary Clinton and her actions as secretary of state GOP

an issue that I know you have been critical of and that is why except tens and tens of millions of dollars from

country with atrocious human rights records especially on women's rights gays and lesbians itself

well we have our rules that we specifically have written into the law to try to prevent foreigners from influencing our elections so

it's actually illegal for anybody to take a contribution for your election from anybody from a foreign country now

these aren't contributions to our campaign the question is do they kinda act like the same thing as a contribution are

they expecting something in return and yes I've been very very loud about the fact not only should they not take money from Saudi Arabia and these other countries they should give it back I

was given ninety lashes six months in prison you know this is the kind of country we should shun or

review but you certainly should be taken and I and I can't find public statements by Hillary Clinton critical of

the country but they didn't take tens of millions of dollars from Saudi Arabia I want to get back to that in a minute let me go to the New York time %HESITATION

foreign entities made payments to the Clinton foundation and true Mister Clinton for high speaking fees and

they receive favors from Mrs Clinton state department in return in other words we see a pattern of financial transactions involving

the Clintons that occur contemporaneous with favorable you S. policy decision yes benefiting those providing the funds your

reaction to that that is that is the definition of pay to play quid pro quo was and I by acts yes

I've been briefed by Peter slides from this book and the facts are going to be alarming they're going to me mind

its detail after detail after detail I promise not to reveal all the details because not my book but

I don't think would happen if you didn't have somebody was a secretary of state and a former president and they seem to be capitalizing on their service and governor and

it sure doesn't remind me a Harry Truman it all reminds me of people using the system to enrich themselves and

I think it looks unseemly I think a lot of Americans are going to be with me what day he mentions of the New York time mentioned

three specific transactions one in Colombia free trade agreement that bet benefited a major donor

there's a possibility that laws may have been broken so I think there's going to be some real questions because there are certain transactions but

the secretary of state does oversee and I'm not going to go to get into the details tonight for the book comes out all

I can say is that the secretary of state has to oversee some transaction and the real question is was

there money that influence these transactions directly or indirectly is there the appearance of impropriety at the very least and

I think that's what voters are gonna have to look at and wonder can we trust someone to be the president I'd stay who's