Sen. Rand Paul Appears on Fox News Channel's Hannity- May 14, 2015

and my next guest for years has been raising questions about George Stephanopoulos joining me now the author of the upcoming new book out

sixteen presidential candidate Kentucky senator rand Paul if you don't think is just an innocent mistake once

a Clinton probably have always one he he didn't think to disclose this I don't buy it for one minute but you've been saying to stop or something I

had my first doubts when I watch their two thousand twelve presidential debates junior member they came to Romney with

his long question about Griswold the Supreme Court case but at the time I'd forgotten what it was about but it was really about the right to privacy in birth control this

debate went on another on a somewhat technical legal point for about three or four minutes on my I've never heard of anybody wants to ban birth control in the modern era and

unusual that people thought that he could be an independent or objective moderator when he had such close ties for decades to the Clinton and

you know that somehow he's going to all suddenly come I able to judge things independently without bias is

the latest revelations that he gave a lot of money to the Clinton foundation and the question is is that our lives

that a payment for access and I don't know that it is you probably got access to Clinton's anyway but

doesn't look right and so I'm glad to fact that their ABC's now saying that he won't dissipated

in debate but I think it goes deeper than that I mean because face of their their Sunday public affairs news program are

he's parading Peter Schweitzer over his book and declaring an ABC news investigation has shown that there's no proof I

want to know if there was coordination with Democrats to hurt Romney because that question came out of no and

that would have a at least explain particular see this isn't just a random occurrence he's now interviewing

the guy who's exposing the Clinton foundation and they're not revealing that he's a donor to the Clinton foundation there's

a direct conflict of interest there and I think really a breach of journalistic haddock and I don't I don't know what's in Stephanopoulos is hard what

he believes or whether you could try to be objective it's just impossible you know I've grown up a partisan I

don't think I'm going to get the Sunday morning show is a nonpartisan ever because as my whole life has been spent is someone who believes in a certain point

of view towards limited government should any Republican call on that program go uneven shows should

made a decision that he's too close to the Clintons to really give an objective interview and I don't mean that to be Nina just is

what it is I would say the same for myself I don't think I could separate myself and be an objective I could be an opinion maker on TV but

I couldn't be with someone who is seen as an objective you know a non partial journal and

I think that's because he spent so many years inside the Clinton operation and also now still be up appears

to be within the ok consortium that is Clinton now I think we'll set and I think that hurt twenty twelve candy Crowley heartened twenty twelve %HESITATION